[Back to Issue 10 ToC] [Back to Journal Contents] [Back to Biochemistry (Moscow) Home page]
[View Full Article] [Download Reprint (PDF)]

Glioblastoma Sensitization to Therapeutic Effects by Glutamine Deprivation Depends on Cellular Phenotype and Metabolism


Alina A. Isakova1,2, Irina N. Druzhkova3, Artem M. Mozherov3, Diana V. Mazur1, Nadezhda V. Antipova1, Kirill S. Krasnov4, Roman S. Fadeev4, Marine E. Gasparian1, Anne V. Yagolovich2,a*

1Shemyakin–Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia

2Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia

3Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 603081 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

4Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: June 3, 2024; Revised: August 23, 2024; Accepted: September 5, 2024
Glutamine plays an important role in tumor metabolism. It is known that the core region of solid tumors is deprived of glutamine, which affects tumor growth and spread. Here we investigated the effect of glutamine deprivation on cellular metabolism and sensitivity of human glioblastoma cells U87MG and T98G to drugs of various origin: alkylating cytostatic agent temozolomide; cytokine TRAIL DR5-B – agonist of the DR5 receptor; and GMX1778 – a targeted inhibitor of the enzyme nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT), limiting NAD biosynthesis. Bioinformatics analysis of the cell transcriptomes showed that U87MG cells have a more differentiated phenotype than T98G, and also differ in the expression profile of the genes associated with glutamine metabolism. Upon glutamine deprivation, growth rate of the U87MG and T98G cells decreased. Analysis of cellular metabolism by FLIM microscopy of NADH as well as assessment of lactate content in the medium showed that glutamine deprivation shifted metabolic status of the U87MG cells towards glycolysis. This was accompanied by the increase in expression of the stemness marker CD133, which collectively could indicate de-differentiation of these cells. At the same time, we observed increase in both expression of the DR5 receptor and sensitivity of the U87MG cells to DR5-B. On the contrary, glutamine deprivation of T98G cells induced metabolic shift towards oxidative phosphorylation, decrease in the DR5 expression and resistance to DR5-B. The effects of NAMPT inhibition also differed between the two cell lines and were opposite to the effects of DR5-B: upon glutamine deprivation, U87MG cells acquired resistance, while T98G cells were sensitized to GMX1778. Thus, phenotypic and metabolic differences between the two human glioblastoma cell lines caused divergent metabolic changes and contrasting responses to different targeted drugs during glutamine deprivation. These data should be considered when developing treatment strategies for glioblastoma via drug-mediated deprivation of amino acids, as well as when exploring novel therapeutic targets.
KEY WORDS: glutamine deprivation, glioblastoma, cell differentiation, CD133, TRAIL, DR5, NAD(P)H, FLIM microscopy, NAMPT, GMX1778

DOI: 10.1134/S0006297924100079

Publisher’s Note. Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.