ISSN 0006-2979, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2025, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 161-172 © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2025.
Russian Text © The Author(s), 2025, published in Biokhimiya, 2025, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 175-188.
161
REVIEW
Memory T Cells: Investigation of Original Models
with Transgenic T Cell Receptors
Dmitry B. Kazansky
1,a
*, Anastasiia A. Kalinina
1
, and Ludmila M. Khromykh
1
1
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation,
115522 Moscow, Russia
a
e-mail: kazansky1@yandex.ru
Received October 31, 2024
Revised December 26, 2024
Accepted December 27, 2024
AbstractThis review summarizes the research data on original mouse models developed in the laboratory
of regulatory mechanisms in immunity of the Research Institute of Carcinogenesis, N.  N.  Blokhin National
Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Transfer of the genes of
individual α- and β-chains of T cell receptors (TCRs) of memory cells has resulted in production of transgenic
animal lines valuable for studying T lymphocyte homeostasis and patterns of formation of their activation
profile markers. Investigation of the transgenic models revealed new features of immune selection and tu-
mor progression. In particular, the fundamental property of some TCRs, termed “chain-centricity”, has been
confirmed; it involves dominance of one of the TCR chains during recognition of the MHC (major histocom-
patibility complex)/peptide complex. This property makes it possible to artificially generate a significant pool
of immunocompetent T  cells so it could be used in adoptive immunotherapy for oncological and infectious
diseases. Transfer of the dominant active TCR α-chains provides the possibility for constructing organisms
with innate specific immunological resistance to certain pathogens. The results of recent studies indicate
that TCR, determining the T lymphocyte relationship with its MHC microenvironment, has an instructive
role in formation of its functions and phenotype. One of these functions may be production of cyclophilin
A by the cortisone-resistant memory cells localized in thymus. The evidence has been accumulated that
expression of TCR with a certain structure and specificity is a sufficient condition for formation of the func-
tional potential of memory cells in a T  cell, regardless of its former interaction with antigenic MHC/peptide
complexes.
DOI: 10.1134/S0006297924603940
Keywords: T lymphocyte, repertoire, major histocompatibility complex, peptide, thymus, T cell receptor,
chain-centricity, cyclophilin A, transgenesis, adaptive immunity, adoptive immunotherapy
Abbreviations: MHC, major histocompatibility complex; TCRs, T cell receptors.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
INTRODUCTION
In the middle of the last century, studies of spe-
cific immunity and immunological tolerance led im-
munologists to realize discrete nature of the carri-
ers performing functions of adaptive immunity. This
understanding resulted in suggestion of the clonal
selection theory of immunity. According to this the-
ory, adaptive immunity is performed by lymphocyte
clones, each of which produces receptors with unique
specificity. Within this theory, immunological toler-
ance could easily be explained by the death or inac-
tivation of the lymphocyte clones expressing receptors
for a tolerant antigen, while specific immunity – by
activation and multiplication of the clones carrying
receptors for an immunogenic antigen. The ability of
some of these clones to persist for a long time, in turn,
explained the phenomenon of immunological memory,
which is the basis of vaccination methods protecting
an organism against dangerous infections. Develop-
ment of the T and B lymphocyte cloning techniques
and further research of the structure and mechanisms
KAZANSKY et al.162
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 90 No. 2 2025
of formation of the unique lymphocyte receptors have
proved beyond any doubts validity of the clonal selec-
tion theory of immunity and its scientific and prog-
nostic significance and effectiveness. Further develop-
ment of the recombinant DNA technologies, as well as
transfection, transduction, and transgenesis methods
opened up a possibility of a wide scope of work in
the field of genetic modification of lymphocytes and
organisms using adaptive immunity receptor genes
and investigation of acquired new properties and
mechanisms of the immune system homeostasis. Full
implementation of this approach in studying immu-
nological memory was impossible due to involvement
of naive T
lymphocytes in the secondary immune re-
sponse. Their activation by an antigen leads to acqui-
sition of an activation marker profile similar to that
of the memory cells, which makes it impossible to dif-
ferentiate them and unambiguously attribute certain
properties to the specific cell type [1]. This situation
was further complicated by acquisition of the memo-
ry cell markers by T
lymphocytes that occurred under
lymphopenia in the absence of antigenic stimulation,
which made the subject of research such as mem-
ory T
cells even more uncertain [2]. The term “vir-
tual memory cells” have appeared in the literature,
but their real relationship to immunological memory
remains unclear, along with the growing conviction
that the T
cells proliferating under lymphopenia are
autoreactive [3, 4]. At the same time, interpretation
of the results of studies focused on the memory cells
obtained from the models constructed with transgenic
T cell receptors (TCRs) did not provide any support
to the notion that the investigated transgenic TCRs
originated from the long-lived memory cells subjected
to prolonged selection during the immune response
invivo. In this context, the T lymphocytes with a trans-
genic TCR that have repeatedly responded to the same
TCR-specific antigen were termed “memory cells”. This
approach appeared to limit the ongoing research on
the epigenetic component of immunological memory.
Doubts have been expressed about the extent to which
such models can accurately characterize real memory
cells that are formed during immunological memory
development. The spectrum of activation markers
and functionality of the transgenic T cells reacting to
the same antigen could be only indirectly associated
with immunological memory [5].
The main obstacle was lack of the methods to
activate memory cells selectively that would facilitate
their cloning and molecular identification of TCR. One
important breakthrough was discovery of the ability
of memory cells to proliferate in response to allogene-
ic antigen-presenting cells (APC) exposed to an acute
heat shock (45°C, 1h) [6]. This feature made it possible
to induce a selective memory cell immune response,
which does not involve naive T lymphocytes [7, 8].
This, in turn, provided the possibility for further cellu-
lar cloning of memory T lymphocytes, obtaining T
cell
hybridomas from them, and identifying their T cell
receptors. One of these receptors, named 1d1, which
is specific to the allogeneic histocompatibility mole-
cule class I (H-2Kb) presented on the EL-4 lymphoma
cells, was subjected to gene cloning and further ad-
vanced study. Retroviral transduction of the genes of
TCR chains into the thymoma 4G4 cells that do not
carry their own TCR and associated CD3 complexes
has shown that such transduction leads to expression
of the transgenic TCR 1d1 and appearance of the CD3
complex on the cell surface [9].
TRANSFER OF THE TCR β-CHAINS GENES –
CONSTRUCTION OF NEW MODELS
FOR STUDYING HOMEOSTATIC
PROLIFERATION OF T CELLS
The next step was to obtain animal lines with
expression of individual transgenic α- and β-chains
of TCR 1d1. Expression of β-chains occurs strictly ac-
cording to the rules of allelic exclusion. Therefore,
the β-chain transgene of the 1d1 receptor contributes
to suppression of gene rearrangement and prevents
expression of endogenous β-chains in the recipient
T lymphocytes. The hCD2 promoter used in the work
of Silaeva et al. [10] initiates transgene expression at
the time of the start of gene rearrangements of en-
dogenous β-chains. By this time, there is a small per-
centage of T cells, in which rearrangement of their
β-chain genes has already occurred and the transgene
expression is suppressed. As a result, the repertoire
of T cells of the transgenic organism consists of two
parts: 10-20% of T cells expressing the genes of their
own rearranged β-chains, and 80-90% of T
cells pro-
ducing the transgenic β-chain. A more detailed analy-
sis of the T lymphocyte characteristics in mice with
the transgenic β-chain showed that the cells express-
ing the transgene are mainly represented by the na-
ive T lymphocytes with the CD44
CD62L
+
phenotype,
whereas the T lymphocytes expressing endogenous
TCR β-chains have the phenotype of activated effector
cells, CD44
+
CD62L
[10]. This could be easily explained
by the fact that survival and homeostasis of T cells
largely depend on receiving tonic signals via interac-
tion of their T cell receptors with the endogenous mol-
ecules of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) [11].
In other words, T  cells need a certain level of phys-
iological autoreactivity for survival and homeostasis
maintenance that prevents their death, just as in the
thymus, where interaction of thymocytes with their
own MHC/peptide complexes promotes their positive
selection and prevents their “death by neglect”. Lower
and upper limits of this physiological autoreactivity
IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY AND TRANSGENIC TCR 163
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 90 No. 2 2025
Fig.  1. A scheme of acquisition of the phenotype of naive or activated cells by a T lymphocyte, based on investigation of
animals with transgenic TCR β-chain. MHC, major histocompatibility complex; TCRs, T cell receptors.
range, likely, facilitate formation of the correspond-
ing phenotypes of naive and activated T  lymphocytes.
Decrease in the diversity of specificities in the TCRs
with transgenic β-chains should lead to the deficit in
receiving such tonic signals and increased competi-
tion of the T  cells for the available endogenous MHC
ligands. On the contrary, the T  lymphocytes that ex-
press a variety of normally rearranged endogenous
β-chains would be under conditions of relative abun-
dance, which could be compared to the conditions of
lymphopenia or immune response to an introduced
pathogenic microorganism multiplying within a body.
Our experiments revealed that the balance between
the naive and activated T  cells is maintained by their
interactions with endogenous MHC/peptide complexes;
it also means that the balance is mediated by auto-
reactivity of T  cells. Moreover, we can significantly
change this balance by influencing interactions of TCR
with the endogenous MHC/peptide complexes – in fa-
vor of naive cells if we limit the interaction, and in
favor of activated cells if we facilitate the interaction.
Thus, acquisition of the naive or activated phenotype
by a T  lymphocyte can be considered as a result of
availability of the corresponding MHC ligands. At the
same time, it became clear that acquisition of the
“activation phenotype” by the T  lymphocyte, which
is characteristic of memory cells, reveals its homeo-
static interaction with the MHC molecules of the cel-
lular environment, rather than actual “experience”
of interaction with a specific antigen. A hypothetical
scheme illustrating acquisition of naive and activated
cell phenotypes by a T  lymphocyte is shown in Fig. 1.
In this case, acquisition of the phenotype of activated
T  cells (CD44
+
CD62L
effectors or CD44
+
CD62L
+
mem-
ory cells) could be caused by interaction with the
specific antigen during an immune response, under
condition of lymphopenia caused by radiation, or by
significant reduction in the diversity of T  cell rep-
ertoire containing different TCRs built from the en-
dogenously rearranged α- and β-chains genes. Onthe
contrary, acquisition of the naive CD44
CD62L
+
phe-
notype could be associated with the lack of antigenic
stimulation or limited diversity of their TCR specificity
due to the invariant transgenic β-chain in their struc-
ture. It is also foreseeable that the proposed scheme
may be relevant for migration of naive T cells through
the lymph and bloodstream, and activated T  lym-
phocytes – through tissues and extravascular areas
of the body.
Β-chains are combined with normally rearranged
endogenous α-chains in both parts of the repertoire.
Since the “transgenic” part of the repertoire contains
an invariant β-chain, diversity of the T  cell receptors
in the transgenic animals is significantly reduced,
which leads to moderate suppression of immune re-
sponses to alloantigens and loss of the ability to reject
an allogeneic tumor. This was shown with the B10.
D2(R101) (KdIdDb) mouse line, which was used as
the genetic basis for expression of the 1d1 receptor
β-chain transgene [10]. Normally, T  lymphocytes of the
wild type mice of this line respond well in the mixed
lymphocyte reaction (MLR) to the stimulator cells iso-
lated from the C57BL/10 (H-2b) or FVB (H-2q) mice.
Transplantation of the EL-4 lymphoma cells originat-
ing from the C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice leads to the devel-
opment of a full-fledged immune response to the lym-
phoma cells and their complete rejection within 12-14
days, despite the fact that antigenic differences in the
transplant antigens in this case are represented only
by the allogeneic molecule H-2Kb. On the other hand,
KAZANSKY et al.164
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 90 No. 2 2025
the response of T  lymphocytes from the transgenic
mice to the C57BL/10 (H-2b) and FVB (H-2q) stimula-
tor cells was reduced. When the EL-4 lymphoma cells
were injected into transgenic mice, the chronic im-
mune response developed, and the immune selection
of tumor cells occurred, followed by the loss of the
H-2Kb molecule, tumor growth, and, as a result, death
of animals 1-2 months after transplantation [12].
TRANSGENIC TCR β-CHAINS –
EFFECTS ON INTERACTION
OF T LYMPHOCYTES WITH TUMOR CELLS
Our research revealed that, despite the antigenic
differences between the tumor (H-2Kb) and the recip-
ient (H-2Kd) in one of the major histocompatibility
antigens, the tumor development process in the an-
imals with the transgenic TCR β-chain acquires char-
acteristics of chronic rejection. It occurs through the
stages of elimination, equilibrium, and escape of the
immune response. This escape is accompanied by the
loss of the specific antigen of tumor cells (the H-2Kb
histocompatibility molecule) in the course of the
process of resisting to the recipient immune system
and selection of the weakly immunogenic variants of
tumor cells under its pressure [12]. In other words,
the phenomenon of rejection of an allogeneic tumor
became a phenomenon of its progression under the
pressure of the immune system in the allogeneic re-
cipient due to the limited diversity of the repertoire
of T  cell receptors. Our data show that effectiveness
of the antitumor immune response could depend on
the range and diversity of the repertoire of T  cell re-
ceptors. Theoretically, this diversity is very high and
amounts to ~10
18
. Only a small part of it is realized,
since the total number of T  cells in the human body
is ~4-5  ×  10
11
[13, 14]. This means that the process of
overcoming of immunological defense by the tumor
and limited successes and achievements in the field of
tumor immunotherapy could be due to the deficiency
in the specificity of T cell receptors necessary for the
successful immunological recognition of tumor neoan-
tigens. It cannot be ruled out that the development
of approaches to artificially expand the repertoire
of receptors of cells of the adaptive immune system
could help to overcome this obstacle. This, in turn,
indicates that success in the development of tumor im-
munotherapy methods should be expected in the area
of delivering of the genes of T  cell receptors with re-
quired specificity to the patients, i.e., a type of passive
immunotherapy. Fundamental aspects of the revealed
patterns are equally important, as they shed light on
the nature of alloreactivity, a phenomenon that ap-
peared to be critically dependent on the diversity of
the T lymphocyte receptor repertoire in the recipient.
The obtained results support the hypothesis that the
T  lymphocyte receptors have an intrinsic ability to re-
act with any of the allelic variants of MHC molecules
[15]. According to it, the allogeneic immune response
is a combination of the responses of individual recip-
ient T  lymphocyte clones to foreign MHC/peptide com-
plexes that did not participate in the negative selec-
tion of T  lymphocytes in the thymus and formation of
their repertoire. On the other hand, negative selection
of T  cells in the thymus as a result of “strong” interac-
tion with their own MHC/peptide complexes could be
considered as the first and last allogeneic reaction of
the emerging repertoire of T  lymphocytes to the self
MHC molecules [16].
TRANSFER OF THE GENES
OF TCR α-CHAINS AND CHAIN-CENTRIC
T CELL RECEPTORS – PROSPECTS
FOR DEVELOPING NEW TECHNOLOGIES
OF IMMUNOLOGICAL PROTECTION
Transgenic T  cell receptors have become an in-
valuable tool for fundamental research on the mech-
anisms of immune system development and adaptive
immunity functioning. Availability of such research
tools for immunologists has provided opportunities
for visualizing the processes of intra-thymus selec-
tion of T  lymphocytes, formation of the ability of im-
mune system to distinguish between the “self” and
“non-self”, and of the processes of development and
differentiation of T  lymphocytes, and the mechanisms
of interaction of T  cell receptors with MHC/peptide
complexes [17].
A number of significant features of TCR biology
prevented the use of this tool in practice. These re-
ceptors are known to be heterodimers consisting of
α- and β- or δ- and γ-chains. The fate of the develop-
ing T  lymphocyte is strictly determined by the partic-
ular V, D, and J segments forming a functional gene,
the sequence of which will be in the reading frame.
During the intra-thymus development, rearrangement
of the gene segments of the β-, δ-, and γ-chains be-
gins first. Formation of the functional variant of the
β-chain gene blocks irreversibly further rearrange-
ments of other genes: the functional gene remains
active, while expression of recombinases and rear-
rangements of other β-, δ-, and γ-chains stops, and
they enter the region of condensed chromatin. At this
stage, a T  lymphocyte could become either an αβ- or
γδ-T cell; any such selection has a strictly alterna-
tive character [18]. Attempts to interfere with this
process and introduce a transgenic β-chain into the
T  lymphocyte negatively affect the immune system
rearrangements of the genes of endogenous β-chains
stop. The mechanism of allelic exclusion is activated,
IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY AND TRANSGENIC TCR 165
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 90 No. 2 2025
which is accompanied by the dramatically reduced
diversity of T  cell receptors. As a result, most of the
receptors contain an externally introduced invari-
ant transgenic β-chain, which leads to suppression
of adaptive immunity [12, 19, 20]. Appearance of the
functional β-chain gene leads to expression of a gene,
protein product of which combines with the surrogate
α-chain, forming a pre-TCR localized in the endoplas-
mic reticulum that possesses an autocatalytic ability
to generate the signal for further T  lymphocyte de-
velopment. This signal initiates the second wave of
recombinase expression and rearrangement of the
α-chain genes, which can occur repeatedly by connect-
ing distally located V and J segments. The secondary
re-arrangement occurs if the previous combination
did not form a functional gene or the formed α-chain
is non-functional at the protein level, i.e., unable to
ensure the TCR interaction with MHC molecules of the
thymus medullary epithelium; as a result, the thymo-
cyte cannot pass the selection. Unlike β-chains, allelic
exclusion of α-chain genes is not strict, and their rear-
rangement could lead to formation of functional genes
on both chromosomes and, accordingly, to a T  lym-
phocyte with two αβ-T cell receptors [21]. Atthis time
point, the fate of the T lymphocyte depends critically
on whether the αβ heterodimer can interact with the
MHC class  II molecules located on the surface of the
thymus epithelium. Stable interaction of TCR with the
MHC class  II molecules mediated selection of the CD4
coreceptor by the developing T  cell. Weak and unsta-
ble interaction of TCR with the molecules of this type
triggers suppression of CD4 expression and commits
to the development towards T  cells with the CD8 core-
ceptor. Complete absence of interaction with the MHC
molecules results in the T  lymphocyte death, which is
called metaphorically “death by neglect”.
Nearly a decade ago, it became clear that the sig-
nificant part of the repertoire of T  cell receptors has
the property of chain-centricity, i.e., one of the TCR
chains is dominant in the recognition of MHC/peptide
complexes [22, 23]. Incorporation of the gene of the
single dominant-active chain of the chain-centric TCR
into the cell creates a unique possibility to influence
its interaction with the MHC/peptide complexes, thus
giving the T  cells a new specificity. It is worth noting
that modification of T  cells with the TCR α-chains has
many significant advantages. Due to the absence of al-
lelic exclusion of the α-chain genes and the possibility
of expressing two TCRα in one lymphocyte, transfer
of the α-chain gene could dramatically expand the
diversity of the repertoire of T  cell receptors without
causing systemic suppression of an immune response.
This possibility was realized by constructing the trans-
genic mouse line, in which α-chain of the chain-centric
TCR (1D1a) was incorporated in the wild-type mouse
genome as a part of the pTα cassette vector, which
provides tissue- and stage-specific expression of the
transgene. The transgenic α-chain originated from the
TCR T  cell hybridoma of memory cells specific to the
H-2Kb alloantigen of the EL-4 lymphoma cells. Com-
pared with the wild-type mice, the transgenic animals
had increased CD3 expression on the surface of dou-
ble negative thymocytes of the DN2 and DN3 stages,
undergoing the processes of gene rearrangement and
selection of functional β-chains. Moreover, increase
in the proportion of CD8
+
cells with the phenotype
of central memory cells (CD44
+
CD62L
+
) and effectors
(CD44
+
CD62L
) was observed in the peripheral lym-
phoid organs. Similarly to the effect of the transgenic
β-chain expression on the surface phenotype of T cells
described above, the data obtained in the analysis of
the 1D1a mice indicate an instructive role of the TCR
structure in the formation of the T  lymphocyte phe-
notypic properties.
The most unexpected finding was that, although
the transgenic mice expressed the α-chain of the origi-
nal TCR without its β-chain, they had developed immu-
nity to the EL-4 lymphoma cells. The animals rejected
the transplanted tumor cells within 2-3 days, which is
typical for the immunized animals with memory cells
for the immunizing antigen (the H-2Kb histocompati-
bility molecule). In MLR, the peripheral lymphocytes
of transgenic animals produced enhanced prolifera-
tive responses to the stimulator cells carrying H-2Kb
histocompatibility molecules on their surface. Thus,
the TCR structure, altered by the transgenesis of only
one α-chain, determined the functional properties of
T  cells in the transgenic organism. At the same time,
immune responses to third-party antigens in the 1D1a
mice were comparable to the wild-type animals. Thus,
expression of the transgenic TCR α-chain does not sup-
press immune responses of the 1D1a mice to other
antigens. During the study, we demonstrated that the
transgenic α-chain originating from the chain-centric
TCR can pair with endogenous β-chains and enter the
surface of T  lymphocytes in the form of heterodimers.
As a result, the repertoire of T  lymphocytes in the
transgenic animals is represented fully or partially by
the lymphocytes carrying an additional T  cell receptor
on the surface, the specificity of which is determined
by the transgenic α-chain [23].
These studies of the chain-centric TCR with domi-
nant active α-chains [23-26] provide a theoretical basis
for creating organisms with innate specific immuno-
logical resistance to certain pathogens.
CHAIN-CENTRIC T CELL RECEPTORS
AND ADOPTIVE IMMUNOTHERAPY
Studies of the 1D1a transgenic mice have shown
that these animals have enhanced innate antitumor
KAZANSKY et al.166
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 90 No. 2 2025
Fig.  2. Gene transfer of the dominant active α-chain of the chain-centric TCR into recipient’s T lymphocytes or into the
zygote results in the repertoire of T lymphocytes with the additional TCR specificity. TCRs, T cell receptors.
immunity due to the expression of the dominant-ac-
tive α-chain of the chain-centric tumor-specific TCR.
Considering that transfer of the dominant α-chain
1D1a gene to the cells redirected the repertoire of
T  cells to fight tumor cells, a similar effect could be
expected with in  vitro modification of normal T  lym-
phocytes with the same dominant α-chain. Indeed, us-
ing retroviral transduction, we generated T  cells that
expressed 1D1a and showed protective and therapeu-
tic effects against the EL-4 lymphoma cells after adop-
tive transfer to the B10.D2(R101) mice [23]. Figure  2
shows how transduction or transfer of the α-chain
gene of the chain-centric TCR creates an additional
receptor and thereby modifies the specificity of the
recipient T  lymphocytes.
These results were confirmed with the infectious
model. The mouse memory T  cells for Salmonella ty-
phimurium antigens were generated in the invivo sys-
tem, with subsequent re-stimulation with antigens of
the same bacterium invitro. To identify the sequences
of TCR clonotypes that responded to re-stimulation, a
new-generation sequencing (NGS) method was used to
obtain repertoires of α-chains of the TCR in the mem-
ory T  cells stimulated by the model pathogen and in
the memory T  cells without stimulation. The α-chain
variants, frequency of which increased in the TCR
repertoire after re-stimulation with the Salmonella
antigens, were individually transduced into the nor-
mal T  lymphocytes. The dominant- active TCR α-chains
were identified by the ability of modified T  cells to
respond by proliferation to the Salmonella antigens
in  vitro. About 20% of the TCR repertoire of memory
cells that responded to Salmonella antigens exhibited
chain-centricity and contained the dominant-active
α-chain [24, 25]. Similar results were obtained in the
research investigating response to the Listeria mono-
cytogenes antigens [27].
Thus, chain-centric TCRs were found to comprise
a significant proportion of the T cell receptors that
respond to bacterial pathogen antigens. Moreover,
we developed an algorithm for the chain-centric re-
ceptor searching, according to which cloning of the
antigen-specific T  cells is not required. Since such
cloning is usually laborious and time-consuming, the
above-mentioned approach is quite desirable to be
applied in practice.
The dominant-active α-chains of the chain-cen-
tric T  cell receptors are promising candidates for the
use in adoptive immunotherapy of oncological and
infectious diseases, similar to the CAR-T chimeric an-
tigenic receptors used in oncology. Advantages of the
chain-centric TCR include the lack of immunogenic-
ity characteristic of the chimeric proteins and the
absence of the negative trans-completion effects on
the signal transmission into the T  lymphocyte, which
are unavoidable in the case of transduction of both
TCR chains. Moreover, it involves a simple and clear
search algorithm along with the possibility of direct
targeting of the immune response to the unique tumor
neoantigens [28, 29]. To assess feasibility of introduc-
tion of this approach into clinical practice, a preclin-
ical study was conducted assessing biosafety of the
T  cell products modified with the chain-centric TCRs
according to the following parameters: physiological
condition of animals, acute toxicity, immunotoxicity,
allergenicity, mutagenicity, tumorigenicity, and phar-
macokinetics. The conducted studies indicate the safe-
ty of the transgenic constructs injected with T  cells.
IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY AND TRANSGENIC TCR 167
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 90 No. 2 2025
At the same time, introduction of T  lymphocytes ac-
tivated during transduction in order to increase ef-
fectiveness of the procedure could lead to nonspe-
cific allergic reactions in the recipient  [30]. Studies
evaluating the safety of the transfer of chain-centric
receptors, characteristics of transgenic animals, and
their differences from the wild-type mice were also
conducted, and the functional condition of the im-
mune system of the 1D1a transgenic mice expressing
the dominant-active α-chain of the chain-centric TCR
specific to the H2-Kb molecule was analyzed. Neither
autoimmune diseases due to the random pairing of
transgenic TCRα with endogenous TCRβ variants nor
considerable disturbance of systemic homeostasis
were observed in the age dynamics of these mice. It
is worth noting that the TCRα transgene expression
could delay thymus involution and maintain the TCRβ
repertoire diversity in the old transgenic mice. Despite
the notable enhancement of the specific immune re-
sponse in the 1D1a mice, responses to the third-party
alloantigens were not affected, indicating that expres-
sion of the transgenic TCRα did not limit the immuno-
reactivity of the transgenic mice [26].
CHAIN-CENTRIC T CELL RECEPTORS
AND IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY
Along with the data accumulation in the research
field, there is a growing recognition of the fact that
chain-centricity is one of the basic properties of the
significant part of T  lymphocyte receptors. The ques-
tion arises: why this feature has not been investigat-
ed explicitly in the scientific literature over the last
half-century? Our analysis of the available sources
has shown that there are numerous indications of this
characteristic in the literature, but indirect in most of
the cases, fragmented, and not properly interpreted
[29]. The reason could be in the artificiality of the dis-
covered phenomenon since the transfer of the genes
of TCR chains does not occur in nature, and functional
value of the chain-centric receptors in the naturally
formed repertoire of T  cells is not clear. Nevertheless,
simultaneous expression of two TCR α-chains due
to successful rearrangement of the genes encoding
them on both chromosomes and incomplete allele ex-
clusion has been known, although, according to the
previous estimates, it is a rare event (1-10%) [31]. Re-
cent estimates of the frequencies of T  cell expressing
two T  cell receptors simultaneously are dramatically
higher and is ~16% [32,  33]. Proportion of these cells
increases considerably with age [34], as well as in
some autoimmune diseases [35]. In the acute phase
of the response to infection with lymphocytic chorio-
meningitis virus (LCMV), up to 60% of the virus-spe-
cific T  cells express double TCR. Moreover, after the
infection is complete, memory cells contain increased
frequencies of the CD4
+
T  cells with two TCRs [36].
It is also interesting that in the patients with Kawa-
saki syndrome who have undergone immunoglobulin
therapy, the proportion of the CD8
+
memory cells with
two TCRs increases [37].
Thus, simultaneous expression of two T  cell recep-
tors has a functional significance and is involved in
formation of immunological memory, but its relation-
ship with the effect of chain-centricity of TCR α-chains
is not obvious. Considering that we detected the first
chain-centric TCR in the long-lived memory cells, it
is likely that the frequencies of such TCRs are rath-
er low at the earlier stages of the immune response.
Presumably, this could be a reason why chain-centric
TCRs were not detected in the 1990s, at the peak of
investigations focused on the structure and functions
of TCR. At the moment, it is not entirely clear wheth-
er chain-centricity is an intrinsic feature of some
T  cell receptors or whether it is related to selection
of the repertoire of memory T  cells. Our work aimed
at identifying frequencies of the chain-centric TCR
during formation of immunological memory would
shed light on this fundamental issue. The results of
the T  cell repertoire study in the animals immunized
with allogeneic tumor cells confirm indirectly the hy-
pothesis of the chain-centric TCR expression mainly
by the memory cells. Using an experimental model
of induction of the antitumor immune response, se-
quential changes in characteristics of the TCR reper-
toire of T  cells involved in the primary and secondary
immune responses to allogeneic tumor antigens were
studied. Bioinformatics analysis of the TCR repertoire
showed that, compared with the primarily activated
effectors, re-stimulation of memory cells with the spe-
cific antigen led to their enrichment with the clono-
types that expressed TCR α-chains with high potential
cross-reactivity and the increased strength of interac-
tion with both MHC molecules and docked peptides.
No significant changes in the psycho-chemical char-
acteristics of TCRβ were observed in the reactivated
clonotypes of memory T cells, which may indicate
the dominant role of TCRα in the secondary alloge-
neic immune response. This effect could be due to
the increase in the frequencies of chain-centric TCRs
during the memory cells formation [38].
IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY
AND CYCLOPHILIN A
In the recent decades, extracellular cyclophilin A
and its biological activity have been objects of seri-
ous studies in our laboratory. Interest in this protein
first arose when T. V.  Anfalova attempted to cultivate
in  vitro thymic T lymphocytes (thymocytes) of mice
KAZANSKY et al.168
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 90 No. 2 2025
treated with high doses of hydrocortisone, causing
apoptosis of more than 98% of thymocytes. A minor
part of the cells remained viable, proliferated in the
in  vitro culture, and secreted into the medium an
unknown factor with the properties of radioprotec-
tor, significantly prolonging life of the animals that
received sublethal doses of radiation. This effect was
found to be associated with the increased migration
of stem cells from the bone marrow of irradiated
animals to their peripheral lymphoid organs. It was
reproduced in  vitro: the factor of cortisone-resistant
thymocytes induced chemotaxis and migration of the
hematopoietic cells of different linages, including
T  cells, B  lymphocytes, monocytes, granulocytes, and
dendritic cells. On this basis, a test suitable for iso-
lating and purifying the target protein was developed.
Further purification and identification of the factor of
cortisone-resistant thymocytes via Edman degradation
allowed identifying cyclophilin  A [39]. Recombinant
production of the human cyclophilin  A with demon-
stration of its biological effects, partially reproducing
the effects of the factor of cortisone-resistant thymo-
cytes, confirmed our previous findings [40, 41]. Fur-
ther investigation of the cyclophilin A biological ac-
tivity attracted a lot of attention when its antitumor
and antimetastatic effects were revealed [42]. We have
shown pro-inflammatory effects of cyclophilin  A in
the study of expression of the genes of acute phase in-
flammatory proteins in the animal liver after admin-
istration of high doses of this protein [43]. Moreover,
cyclophilin  A, similar to the well-known proinflamma-
tory factor TNFα, appears to exhibit an embryotoxic
effect, disrupting embryonic development during or-
ganogenesis [44]. Thus, cyclophilin A is involved in
regulation of acute inflammation, but its role and
part in the regulation of this response has yet to be
established.
A wide range of studies have revealed the in-
volvement of the extracellular cyclophilin  A in in-
flammatory and autoimmune diseases. The available
data are presented and discussed in the reviews by
Kalinina et  al.  [45] and Xue et  al.  [46]. The function
of this protein in immunoregulation involves polar-
ization of the immune response towards the type  1
T  helper cells [47].
Two areas (pieces) of our studies, the investiga-
tion of memory cells and of cyclophilin A, which ap-
pear to be not closely related, suddenly fit the puz-
zle when we determined that the cortisone–resistant
thymocytes (producers of cyclophilin A [39]) contain
memory T  cells, comprising the major part of this cell
population. Administration of hydrocortisone at a dose
of 2.5  mg per animal to the pre-immunized animals
led to the 95-98% decrease in the thymus cellularity,
but at the same time to the multifold increase in the
proliferative response of the remaining lymphocytes
in the thymus to the immunizing antigen. This indi-
cated enrichment of the thymocyte population with
the mature cortisone-resistant lymphocytes with the
antigenic specificity [48]. Most likely, exposure to high
doses of hydrocortisone enriches the thymus with
T  lymphocytes that express high levels of antiapoptot-
ic molecules (which was repeatedly noted in memory
cells) [49, 50].
Cyclophilin  A is known to play an important
role in the negative regulation of apoptosis [51, 52].
Moreover, there are common features in the signal-
ing pathways involved in the memory cell differenti-
ation and regulation of oxidative stress by cyclophi-
lin  A [53, 54]. It was also shown in the recent study
that in the course of the signal transduction through
TCR, cyclophilin A regulates activity of the ZAP70 ty-
rosine kinase, which is important for activation and
differentiation of T  cells [55]. According to the data
available to date, the increased level of cyclophilin  A
appears to be part of the epigenetic profile of the
memory T  cells.
The reason and biological significance of the
memory T  cells emergence in the thymus remain
enigmatic. The thymus is traditionally considered to
be a central lymphoid organ focused on the export
of T  lymphocytes formed in it. The major function of
the thymus involves creation of a microenvironment
that ensures expression of RAG-1 and -2 recombinases
responsible for recombination of the TCR gene seg-
ments in T  lymphocytes. Therefore, memory T  cells
are assumed to migrate to thymus to edit α-chains
of their TCR, which would have the following conse-
quences: (i)  maintenance of the diversity of the T  lym-
phocyte receptor repertoire on the periphery due to
the changes in TCR of memory cells that formed in
excess during the immune response and became “un-
necessary” upon its completion; (ii)  formation of TCR
α-chains that ensure high affinity of the memory T  cell
receptors to the antigen. In other words, TCR editing
of a memory cell could lead to the formation of ei-
ther a receptor with a new specificity or a chain-cen-
tric TCR with an increased interaction affinity of its
α-chain to the original (immunizing) MHC/peptide
complexes [38]. Based on the data available to date,
we believe that the TCR editing, leading to the for-
mation of a chain-centric receptor, could be one of
the mechanisms of T  cell functional avidity matura-
tion, similar to the affinity maturation of the B-lym-
phocyte receptor. Figure  3 presents the hypothetical
scheme (based on the data results described in this
work) of the T  lymphocyte repertoire formation and
further transformations of T  lymphocytes during the
immune response. This scheme differs from the oth-
er models of linear differentiation of memory cells
from naive precursors into effectors and further into
memory cells, since it assumes formation of memory
IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY AND TRANSGENIC TCR 169
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 90 No. 2 2025
Fig. 3. Memory cells during the antigen-independent formation of the T cell repertoire in the immune response and its
completion. TCRs, T cell receptors.
cells regardless of the initial contact with the antigen.
This formation is determined by the TCR structure and
features of its interaction with the microenvironment
of the T  lymphocyte. In this case, there are T  cells,
which perform in the secondary immune response
functions that we call immunological memory. Our
experiments showed that T cells with the properties
of memory cells pre-exist before the contact with
the antigen. They appear to be “not visible” in the
primary immune response due to their small num-
ber and long time required for their antigen-specific
clones to grow to the experimentally detectable size.
They could also be detected in the primary response
if the α-chain transgene of the chain-centric TCR is
introduced into an organism. The presented scheme
of the memory cell formation, regardless of antigenic
stimulus, is in agreement with the existing ideas about
the constitutive formation of memory cells and early
determination of their fate [56, 57], which now has
direct experimental confirmation [23, 26].
Based on the results of our studies of the cor-
tisone-resistant thymocytes, we suggest that memory
cells could be producers of cyclophilin  A, which pro-
motes such “secondary selection” of T  lymphocytes in
the thymus.
Exhaustive evidence of this is not yet available,
but its exploration may be an important area of fur-
ther research. It has not been ruled out that cyclo-
philin  A could serve as a diagnostic marker for the
detection and identification of memory cells.
CONCLUSION
In general, it could be concluded based on the
results of our investigations that the relevant study
of immunological memory should be based on tech-
niques that provide an assessment of their specifici-
ty, functional properties, and protective effects. It has
been generally recognized that expression of the
genes of activation markers in T lymphocytes mostly
reflects general homeostatic interactions of the lym-
phoid system with the microenvironment rather than
an immune response to foreign antigens, and cannot
be directly attributed to the properties characterizing
cells of immunological memory. Memory cell cloning
with further identification of their TCRs allowed us
to reveal a relationship between the formation of im-
munological memory and accumulation of T  lympho-
cytes with chain-centric receptors. The notion about
such property of the part of TCRs has not been so
far fully clarified. Advances made during the study of
such receptors are promising for the development of
new methods of adoptive immunotherapy of cancer
and infectious diseases, as well as for creating organ-
isms with innate specific resistance to bacterial and
viral pathogens. The obtained data of the pilot study
indicate possible association between immunological
memory and cyclophilin  A production. In the future,
it seems very important to clarify the role of cyclo-
philin A in the formation and functioning of memo-
ry T  cells and to obtain data confirming or rejecting
KAZANSKY et al.170
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 90 No. 2 2025
the hypothesis implying the existence of the mecha-
nism of “secondary selection” in the memory cells in
the thymus.
Contributions. D.B.K., A.A.K., and L.M.Kh. partic-
ipated in the general discussion of the concept, ide-
ology, and work plan scheduling; D.B.K. prepared the
manuscript; A.A.K. and L.M.Kh. edited the manuscript
and performed its technical design.
Funding. This work was financially supported by
the Russian Science Foundation [grant no.22-15-00342
(2022-2024)].
Ethics approval and consent to participate. This
work does not contain any studies involving human
and animal subjects.
Conflict of interest. The authors of this work de-
clare that they have no conflicts of interest in finan-
cial or any other sphere.
REFERENCES
1. Gray, D. (1993) Immunological memory, Annu. Rev.
Immunol., 11, 49-77, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.
iy.11.040193.000405.
2. Murali-Krishna, K., and Ahmed, R. (2000) Cutting
edge: naive T cells masquerading as memory cells,
J. Immunol., 165, 1733-1737, https://doi.org/10.4049/
jimmunol.165.4.1733.
3. Seok, J., Cho, S.-D., Seo, S. J., and Park, S.-H. (2023)
Roles of virtual memory T cells in diseases, Immune
Network, 23, e11, https://doi.org/10.4110/in.2023.23.e11.
4. Drobek, A., Moudra, A., Mueller, D., Huranova, M.,
Horkova, V., Pribikova, M., Ivanek, R., Oberle, S.,
Zehn, D., McCoy, K. D., Draber, P., and Stepanek, O.
(2018) Strong homeostatic TCR signals induce for-
mation of self-tolerant virtual memory CD8 T cells,
EMBO J., 37, e98518, https://doi.org/10.15252/
embj.201798518.
5. Haynes, L., Linton, P.-J., and Swain, S. L. (1997) Age-
related changes in CD4 T cells of T cell receptor
transgenic mice, Mech. Ageing Dev., 93, 95-105, https://
doi.org/10.1016/S0047-6374(96)01826-X.
6. Kazanskiĭ, D. B., Petrishchev, V. N., Shtil’, A. A.,
Chernysheva, A. D., Sernova, N. V., Abronina, I. F.,
Pobezinskiĭ, L.A., and Agafonova, E.L. (1999) Use of
heat shock of antigen-presenting cells for functional
testing of allospecificity memory T-cells [in Russian],
Bioorg. Khim., 25, 117-128.
7. Pobezinskaya, E. L., Pobezinskii, L. A., Silaeva, Y. Y.,
Anfalova, T. V., Khromykh, L.M., Tereshchenko, T.S.,
Zvezdova, E.S., and Kazanskii, D.B. (2004) Cross reac-
tivity of Tcell receptor on memory CD8+ cells isolated
after immunization with allogeneic tumor cells, Bull.
Exp. Biol. Med., 137, 493-498, https://doi.org/10.1023/
b:bebm.0000038162.13508.3a.
8. Grinenko, T.S., Pobezinskaya, E.L., Pobezinskii, L.A.,
Baturina, I. A., Zvezdova, E. S., and Kazanskii, D. B.
(2005) Suppression of primary allogenic response by
CD8+ memory cells, Bull. Exp. Biol. Med., 140, 545-549,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-006-0020-8.
9. Zvezdova, E. S., Grinenko, T. S., Pobezinskaia, E. L.,
Pobezinskiĭ, L. A., and Kazanskiĭ, D. B. (2008) Core-
ceptor function of CD4 in response to MHC class I
molecule [in Russian], Mol. Biol., 42, 662-672.
10. Silaeva, Y.Y., Kalinina, A.A., Vagida, M.S., Khromykh,
L. M., Deikin, A. V., Ermolkevich, T. G., Sadchikova,
E. R., Goldman, I. L., and Kazansky, D. B. (2013) De-
crease in pool of T lymphocytes with surface pheno-
types of effector and central memory cells under influ-
ence of TCR transgenic β-chain expression, Biochem-
istry (Moscow), 78, 549-559, https://doi.org/10.1134/
S0006297913050143.
11. Cho, J.-H., and Sprent, J. (2018) TCR tuning of
T cell subsets, Immunol. Rev., 283, 129-137, https://
doi.org/10.1111/imr.12646.
12. Silaeva, Y. Y., Grinenko, T. S., Vagida, M. S., Kalinina,
A. A., Khromykh, L. M., and Kazansky, D. B. (2014)
Immune selection of tumor cells in TCR β-chain trans-
genic mice, J. Immunotoxicol., 11, 393-399, https://
doi.org/10.3109/1547691X.2013.861548.
13. Sender, R., Weiss, Y., Navon, Y., Milo, I., Azulay, N.,
Keren,L., Fuchs,S., Ben-Zvi,D., Noor,E., and Milo,R.
(2023) The total mass, number, and distribution of
immune cells in the human body, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 120, e2308511120, https://doi.org/10.1073/
pnas.2308511120.
14. Lythe, G., Callard, R. E., Hoare, R. L., and Molina-
París, C. (2016) How many TCR clonotypes does a
body maintain? J. Theor. Biol., 389, 214-224, https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.10.016.
15. Zerrahn,J., Held,W., and Raulet, D.H. (1997) TheMHC
reactivity of the T cell repertoire prior to positive
and negative selection, Cell, 88, 627-636, https://
doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81905-4.
16. Kazansky, D. B. (2008) MHC restriction and allogene-
ic immune responses, J. Immunotoxicol., 5, 369-384,
https://doi.org/10.1080/15476910802476708.
17. Von Boehmer,H. (1992) Thymic selection: a matter of
life and death, Immunol. Today, 13, 454-458, https://
doi.org/10.1016/0167-5699(92)90075-I.
18. Livak, F., Petrie, H. T., Crispe, I. N., and Schatz, D. G.
(1995) In-frame TCR delta gene rearrangements
play a critical role in the alpha beta/gamma delta
T cell lineage decision, Immunity, 2, 617-627, https://
doi.org/10.1016/1074-7613(95)90006-3.
19. Uematsu, Y., Ryser, S., Dembić, Z., Borgulya, P.,
Krimpenfort, P., Berns, A., von Boehmer, H., and
Steinmetz, M. (1988) In transgenic mice the intro-
duced functional T cell receptor beta gene prevents
expression of endogenous beta genes, Cell, 52, 831-
841, https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90425-4.
IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY AND TRANSGENIC TCR 171
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 90 No. 2 2025
20. Rimm, I.J., Krenger,W., Beland, J. L., Geller, M.C., di
Savino, E., Yui, K., Katsumata, M., and Ferrara, J. L.
(1996) TCR-beta transgenic mice fail to mediate a
GVHR due to defects of allorecognition and subse-
quent IL-2 generation, Bone Marrow Transplant., 17,
835-842.
21. Petrie, H.T., Livak,F., Schatz, D.G., Strasser,A., Crispe,
I. N., and Shortman, K. (1993) Multiple rearrange-
ments in Tcell receptor alpha chain genes maximize
the production of useful thymocytes, J.Exp. Med., 178,
615-622, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.178.2.615.
22. Nakatsugawa, M., Yamashita, Y., Ochi, T., Tanaka, S.,
Chamoto, K., Guo, T., Butler, M. O., and Hirano, N.
(2015) Specific roles of each TCR hemichain in gener-
ating functional chain-centric TCR, J. Immunol., 194,
3487-3500, https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1401717.
23. Zamkova,M., Kalinina,A., Silaeva,Y., Persiyantseva,N.,
Bruter,A., Deikin,A., Khromykh,L., and Kazansky,D.
(2019) Dominant role of the α-chain in rejection of tu-
mor cells bearing a specific alloantigen in TCRα trans-
genic mice and in invitro experiments, Oncotarget, 10,
4808-4821, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27093.
24. Kalinina, A.A., Nesterenko, L.N., Bruter, A.V., Balunets,
D.V., Chudakov, D.M., Izraelson,M., Britanova, O.V.,
Khromykh, L. M., and Kazansky, D. B. (2020) Adop-
tive immunotherapy based on chain-centric TCRs in
treatment of infectious diseases, IScience, 23, 101854,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101854.
25. Kalinina,A., Bruter,A., Nesterenko,L., Khromykh,L.,
and Kazansky, D. (2021) Generation of TCRα-trans-
duced Tcells for adoptive transfer therapy of salmo-
nellosis in mice, STAR Protocols, 2, 100368, https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100368.
26. Kalinina, A.A., Ziganshin, R.K., Silaeva, Y.Y., Sharova,
N. I., Nikonova, M. F., Persiyantseva, N. A., Gorkova,
T.G., Antoshina, E.E., Trukhanova, L.S., Donetskova,
A. D., Komogorova, V. V., Litvina, M. M., Mitin, A. N.,
Zamkova, M. A., Bruter, A. V., Khromykh, L. M., and
Kazansky, D.B. (2023) Physiological and functional ef-
fects of dominant active TCRα expression in transgenic
mice, Int.J. Mol. Sci., 24, 6527, https://doi.org/10.3390/
ijms24076527.
27. Kazansky, D. B., Khromykh, L. M., Kalinina, A. A., Silaeva,
Y. Y., Zamkova, M. A., Bruter, A. V., Persiyantseva, N.
A., Chikileva, I. O., Dzholokhava, L. H., Nesterenko,
L.N., Sobyanin, K. A., and Knyazhanskaya, E. S. (2019)
A method of anti-infectious immunological protection
against Salmonella typhimurium and Listeria monocy-
togenes using T lymphocyte transgenesis, Patent for
invention RU 2706554 12/13/2017, Russia.
28. Kazansky, D. B., Kalinina, A. A., Zamkova, M. A.,
Khromykh, L. M., and Persiyantseva, N. A. (2020)
Chain-centricity of TCR phenomenon – opportu-
nities and problems of application in medicine
[in Russian], Immunologiya, 41, 421-431, https://
doi.org/10.33029/0206-4952-2020-41-5-421-431.
29. Kalinina, A.A., Khromykh, L.M., and Kazansky, D.B.
(2023) T cell receptor chain centricity: the phenome-
non and potential applications in cancer immunother-
apy, Int.J. Mol. Sci., 24, 15211, https://doi.org/10.3390/
ijms242015211.
30. Kalinina, A., Bruter, A., Persiyantseva, N., Silaeva, Y.,
Zamkova,M., Khromykh,L., and Kazansky,D. (2022)
Safety evaluation of the mouse TCRα – transduc-
ed T cell product in preclinical models in vivo and
in vitro, Biomed. Pharmacother., 145, 112480, https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112480.
31. Padovan, E., Casorati, G., Dellabona, P., Meyer, S.,
Brockhaus, M., and Lanzavecchia, A. (1993) Expres-
sion of two T cell receptor α chains: dual receptor
T cells, Science, 262, 422-424, https://doi.org/10.1126/
science.8211163.
32. Luo, O. J., Lei, W., Zhu, G., Ren, Z., Xu, Y., Xiao, C.,
Zhang, H., Cai, J., Luo, Z., Gao, L., Su, J., Tang, L.,
Guo, W., Su, H., Zhang, Z.-J., Fang, E. F., Ruan, Y.,
Leng, S. X., Ju, Z., Lou, H., Gao, J., Peng, N., Chen, J.,
Bao,Z., Liu, F., and Chen,G. (2022) Multidimensional
single-cell analysis of human peripheral blood reveals
characteristic features of the immune system land-
scape in aging and frailty, Nature Aging, 2, 348-364,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-022-00198-9.
33. Zhu,L., Peng,Q., Li,J., Wu,Y., Wang,J., Zhou,D., Ma,L.,
and Yao, X. (2023) scRNA-seq revealed the special
TCRβ & α V(D)J allelic inclusion rearrangement and
the high proportion dual (or more) TCR-expressing
cells, Cell Death Dis., 14, 487, https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41419-023-06004-7.
34. Jun, L., Lanwei, Z., Jiayi, W., and Xinsheng, Y. (2024)
A new immunological index for the elderly: high
proportion of multiple TCR T cells based on scRNA-
Seq, Aging Dis., 15, 948-950, https://doi.org/10.14336/
AD.2023.0509-1.
35. Bradley, C.P., Teng,F., Felix, K.M., Sano,T., Naskar,D.,
Block, K.E., Huang,H., Knox, K.S., Littman, D.R., and
Wu, H.-J. J. (2017) Segmented filamentous bacteria
provoke lung autoimmunity by inducing gut-lung axis
Th17 cells expressing Dual TCRs, Cell Host Microbe, 22,
697-704.e4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.10.007.
36. Yang,L., Jama,B., Wang,H., Labarta-Bajo,L., Zúñiga,
E. I., and Morris, G. P. (2020) TCRα reporter mice re-
veal contribution of dual TCRα expression to T cell
repertoire and function, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117,
32574-32583, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013188117.
37. Xu, Y., Yuan, Y., Mou, L., Hui, L., Zhang, X., Yao, X.,
and Li, J. (2024) scRNA+TCR-seq reveals the pivotal
role of dual receptor Tlymphocytes in the pathogen-
esis of Kawasaki disease and during IVIG treatment,
Front. Immunol., 15, 1457687, https://doi.org/10.3389/
fimmu.2024.1457687.
38. Kalinina,A., Persiyantseva,N., Britanova,O., Lupyr,K.,
Shagina, I., Khromykh, L., and Kazansky, D. (2023)
Unique features of the TCR repertoire of reactivated
KAZANSKY et al.172
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 90 No. 2 2025
memory T cells in the experimental mouse tumor
model, Computat. Struct. Biotechnol.J., 21, 3196-3209,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2023.05.028.
39. Khromykh, L. M., Kulikova, N. L., Anfalova, T. V.,
Muranova, T. A., Abramov, V. M., Vasiliev, A. M.,
Khlebnikov, V.S., and Kazansky, D.B. (2007) Cyclophi-
linA produced by thymocytes regulates the migration
of murine bone marrow cells, Cell. Immunol., 249, 46-
53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellimm.2007.11.002.
40. Kalinina, A. A., Silaeva, Yu. Yu., Kazansky, D. B.,
and Khromykh, L. M. (2019) The role of recombi-
nant human cyclophilin A in the antitumor im-
mune response, Acta Naturae, 11, 63-67, https://
doi.org/10.32607/20758251-2019-11-2-63-67.
41. Kalinina, A. A., Kolesnikov, A. V., Kozyr, A. V.,
Kulikova, N. L., Zamkova, M. A., Kazansky, D. B.,
and Khromykh, L. M. (2022) Preparative production
and purification of recombinant human cyclophi-
lin A, Biochemistry (Moscow), 87, 259-268, https://
doi.org/10.1134/S0006297922030063.
42. Kalinina,A., Golubeva,I., Kudryavtsev,I., Khromova,N.,
Antoshina,E., Trukhanova,L., Gorkova,T., Kazansky,D.,
and Khromykh,L. (2021) Cyclophilin A is a factor of
antitumor defense in the early stages of tumor devel-
opment, Int. Immunopharmacol., 94, 107470, https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107470.
43. Kalinina,A., Zamkova,M., Antoshina,E., Trukhanova,L.,
Gorkova, T., Kazansky, D., and Khromykh, L. (2019)
Analyses of the toxic properties of recombinant
human cyclophilin A in mice, J. Immunotoxicol.,
16, 182-190, https://doi.org/10.1080/1547691X.2019.
1665597.
44. Kalinina,A., Semenova, M., Bruter, A., Varlamova,E.,
Kubekina, M., Pavlenko, N., Silaeva, Y., Deikin, A.,
Antoshina,E., Gorkova,T., Trukhanova,L., Salmina,A.,
Novikova, S., Voronkov, D., Kazansky, D., and
Khromykh, L. (2023) Cyclophilin A as a pro-inflam-
matory factor exhibits embryotoxic and teratogenic
effects during fetal organogenesis, Int.J. Mol. Sci., 24,
11279, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411279.
45. Kalinina, A.A., Khromykh, L.M., and Kazansky, D.B.
(2017) Cyclophilin A: structure and functions, Adv.
Mol. Oncol., 4, 17-23, https://doi.org/10.17650/2313-
805X-2017-4-4-17-23.
46. Xue, C., Sowden, M. P., and Berk, B. C. (2018) Extra-
cellular and intracellular cyclophilin A, native and
post-translationally modified, show diverse and spe-
cific pathological roles in diseases, Arterioscler. Throm-
bos. Vasc. Biol., 38, 986-993, https://doi.org/10.1161/
ATVBAHA.117.310661.
47. Bharadwaj,U., Zhang,R., Yang,H., Li,M., Doan, L.X.,
Chen, C., and Yao, Q. (2005) Effects of cyclophilin A
on myeloblastic cell line KG-1 derived dendritic
Like Cells (DLC) Through p38 MAP kinase activa-
tion, J. Surg. Res., 127, 29-38, https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.jss.2005.02.020.
48. Kazansky, D.B., Vagida, M.S., Silaeva, Yu.Yu., Kalinina,
A.A., Zamkova, M.A., Khromykh, L.M., Persiyantseva,
N.A., and Jolokhava, L.Kh. (2017) Functional capacity
of memory cells CD8+ under lymphopenia induced by
injection of hydrocortisone, Adv. Mol. Oncol., 4, 42-48,
https://doi.org/10.17650/2313-805X-2017-4-4-42-48.
49. Garcia,S., DiSanto,J., and Stockinger,B. (1999) Follow-
ing the development of a CD4 Tcell response invivo,
Immunity, 11, 163-171, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-
7613(00)80091-6.
50. Wojciechowski, S., Tripathi, P., Bourdeau, T., Acero, L.,
Grimes, H.L., Katz, J.D., Finkelman, F.D., and Hildeman,
D.A. (2007) Bim/Bcl-2 balance is critical for maintain-
ing naive and memory Tcell homeostasis, J.Exp. Med.,
204, 1665-1675, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20070618.
51. Chen,L., Zeng,Z., Luo,H., Xiao,H., and Zeng,Y. (2024)
Theeffects of CypA on apoptosis: potential target for
the treatment of diseases, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.,
108, 28, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-023-12860-2.
52. Daneri-Becerra,C., Valeiras,B., Gallo, L.I., Lagadari,M.,
and Galigniana, M. D. (2021) CyclophilinA is a mito-
chondrial factor that forms complexes with p23– cor-
relative evidence for an anti-apoptotic action, J. Cell
Sci., 134, jcs253401, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.253401.
53. Ma,Z., Zhang,W., Wu,Y., Zhang,M., Wang,L., Wang,Y.,
Wang,Y., and Liu,W. (2021) CyclophilinA inhibitsA549
cell oxidative stress and apoptosis by modulating
the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, Biosci. Rep.,
41, BSR20203219, https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20203219.
54. Wells, A. C., Hioki, K. A., Angelou, C. C., Lynch, A.C.,
Liang, X., Ryan, D. J., Thesmar, I., Zhanybekova, S.,
Zuklys, S., Ullom, J., Cheong, A., Mager, J., Hollander,
G.A., Pobezinskaya, E.L., and Pobezinsky, L.A. (2023)
Let-7 enhances murine anti-tumor CD8 Tcell respons-
es by promoting memory and antagonizing termi-
nal differentiation, Nat. Commun., 14, 5585, https://
doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40959-7.
55. Anto, N. P., Arya, A. K., Muraleedharan, A., Shaik, J.,
Nath, P. R., Livneh, E., Sun, Z., Braiman, A., and
Isakov, N. (2023) Cyclophilin A associates with and
regulates the activity of ZAP70 in TCR/CD3-stimulated
Tcells, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 80, 7, https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00018-022-04657-9.
56. De Boer, R.J., and Yates, A.J. (2023) Modeling Tcell fate,
Annu. Rev. Immunol., 41, 513, https://doi.org/10.1146/
annurev-immunol-101721-040924.
57. Kretschmer,L., Fuchs,N., Busch, D.H., and Buchholz,
V. R. (2023) Picking up speed: cell cycle regulation
during effector CD8
+
T cell differentiation, Med. Mi-
crobiol. Immunol., 212, 253-260, https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00430-023-00768-7.
Publishers Note. Pleiades Publishing remains
neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published
maps and institutional affiliations. AI tools may have
been used in the translation or editing of this article.