ISSN 0006-2979, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2023, Vol. 88, No. 11, pp. 1778-1785 © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2023.
Published in Russian in Biokhimiya, 2023, Vol. 88, No. 11, pp. 2156-2165.
1778
Actuarial Aging Rates in Human Cohorts
L e o n i d A . G a v r i l o v
1,2,a
* and Natalia S. Gavrilova
1,2
1
NORC at the University of Chicago, 60637 Chicago, IL, USA
2
Institute for Demographic Research, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences,
109028 Moscow, Russia
a
e-mail: lagavril@yahoo.com
Received August 1, 2023
Revised October 8, 2023
Accepted October 9, 2023
Abstract Aging rate is an important characteristic of human aging. Attempts to measure aging rates through the Gompertz
slope parameter lead to a conclusion that actuarial aging rates were stable during the most of the 20th century, but recently
demonstrate an increase over time in the majority of studied populations. These findings were made using cross-sectional
mortality data rather than by the analysis of mortality of real birth cohorts. In this study we analyzed historical changes of
actuarial aging rates in human cohorts. The Gompertz parameters were estimated in the age interval 50-80 years using data
on one-year cohort age-specific death rates from the Human Mortality Database (HMD). Totally, data for 2,294 cohorts
of men and women from 76 populations were analyzed. Changes of the Gompertz slope parameter in the studied cohorts
revealed two distinct patterns for actuarial aging rate. In higher mortality Eastern European countries actuarial aging rates
showed continuous decline from the 1910 to 1940 birth cohort. In lower mortality Western European countries, Australia,
Canada, Japan, New Zealand, and USA actuarial aging rates declined from the 1910th to approximately 1930th cohort
and then increased. Overall, in 50 out of 76 populations (68%) actuarial aging rate demonstrated decreasing pattern of
change over time. Compensation effect of mortality(CEM) was tested for the first time in human cohorts and the cohort
species-specific lifespan was estimated. CEM was confirmed using cohort data and human cohort species-specific lifespan
estimates were similar to the estimates obtained for the cross-sectional data published earlier.
DOI: 10.1134/S0006297923110093
Keywords: aging, mortality, compensation effect of mortality, species-specific lifespan, aging rate
Abbreviations: CEM,compensation effect of mortality.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
INTRODUCTION
Studies of age-specific mortality patterns and ac-
tuarial aging rate in particular are important for under-
standing the fundamental biology of aging and to devel-
op genuine anti-aging interventions [1]. The aging rate
is often estimated as a slope coefficient of the Gompertz
law describing exponential increase of mortality rate
with age (also known as the Gompertz slope or actuar-
ial aging rate) [2, 3]. This approach looks reasonable,
because hypothetical non-aging populations have slope
coefficient equal to zero, and because the slope param-
eter characterizes the rate of mortality increase with age.
Earlier studies of actuarial aging rate in humans
showed increasing trend during the last 30 years in most
countries [2, 3]. These results of increasing aging rates
in contemporary populations look counterintuitive given
continuous decline of mortality among adults. Math-
ematical reliability theory of aging indicates that the
slope coefficient is determined not only by the rate of
functional loss with age (“true aging rate”), but also by
the initial redundancy levels (initial reserve capacity)
[1, 4]. Thus, actuarial aging rate is determined not only
by intrinsic deterioration of organs and tissues, but also
by other factors including environmental effects.
Actuarial aging rates are different across different
populations and are organized in such a way that low-
er initial mortality is compensated for by its more rapid
growth with age. This means that high mortality rates in
disadvantaged populations (within a given species) are
compensated for by a low actuarial aging rate (longer
mortality doubling period). As a result of this compen-
sation, mortality rates tend to converge at older ages [1].
This phenomenon is called compensation effect of mor-
tality (CEM) [2].
ACTUARIAL AGING RATES IN HUMAN COHORTS 1779
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 88 No. 11 2023
We have previously examined the historical chang-
es of the actuarial aging rates and the compensation ef-
fect of mortality using cross-sectional mortality data [2].
However, this approach was subjected to a constructive
criticism that the CEM should be studied with cohort
data [5]. This paper takes this criticism into account and
investigates historical changes in the actuarial aging rate
and the compensation effect of mortality using cohort
data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
One of the goals of this study was to analyze histor-
ical changes of actuarial aging rates and test the com-
pensation effect of mortality in human cohorts. These
analyses were not conducted before with cohort data
and all studies of actuarial aging rates and CEM so far
were made using cross-sectional data [1-3, 6].
Methods. In the first step of the analyses, we have
calculated parameters R
0
and α of the Gompertz equa-
tion(1):
μ(x) = R
0
exp(αx), (1)
where μ(x) is a cohort mortality (age-specific cohort
death rate) at age x and R
0
and α are the Gompertz
parameters. For historical cross-sectional data, actuar-
ial aging rate is usually estimated using the Gompertz–
Makeham equation with additional age-independent
Makeham term. In the case of cohort data (unlike
cross-sectional data) the Makeham term (or background
mortality) is not stable over age, because it is changing
with calendar time. It was also found that in contempo-
rary populations background mortality is very low [1, 7]
and hence has no noticeable effect on the estimates of
the Gompertz parameters. In this case we use the fact
that after the 1960s background mortality decreased to
very low levels close to zero [2,8]. Thus, the Makeham
parameter can be ignored for parameter estimates at ages
over 50 years and 1910 and later birth cohorts. Bongaarts
estimated background and senescent (age-dependent)
mortality by age using cause-of-death data and found
that after age 50-60 years mortality is determined almost
entirely by the senescent mortality [7].
Parameters of the Gompertz model were estimated
using method of non-linear regression in the age inter-
val 50-80 years (nlin procedure in Stata package, ver-
sion 14) as it was suggested before for cross-sectional
data [6]. Age interval 50-80 years is characterized by in-
creasing life table aging rate for females (mortality accel-
eration), whereas for male cohorts this regularity is not
so clear [9, 10]. It is believed that this age interval shows
pattern of age-specific mortality change for senescent
mortality [10]. Some researchers use logistic model to
study historical changes in period mortality in order to
capture mortality deceleration after age 85 years [6, 7].
In our study we analyze mortality below age 85years,
so that applying the Gompertz model is justified.
There is concern that the least squares fit often
leads to an ill-defined non-linear optimization problem,
which is extremely sensitive to sampling errors and the
smallest systematic demographic variations [11]. This
problem was discussed in our earlier publication [2].
Historical trends of actuarial aging rates for each
population of men and women (from 1910 to 1940 co-
hort) were estimated using linear regression model and
analyzing the sign and statistical significance of the re-
gression slope parameter.
CEM can be quantified using the inverse relation-
ship of the Gompertz parameters(2):
lnR
0
= lnM– Bα. (2)
Species-specific lifespan (parameter B in equation 2)
was obtained by running linear regressions between the
Gompertz parameters (lnR
0
and α) of the form present-
ed in equation 2. Thus, the species-specific lifespan
(slope parameter, B) and the intercept parameter(lnM)
have been estimated.
Data. Human Mortality Database (HMD) was used
as a source of mortality data for this study [12]. This da-
tabase contains mortality data for 42 countries with rea-
sonably good quality of demographic statistics. Totally
we used age-specific cohort death rates for 3304 cohorts
available in HMD covering data for 1900-1940 birth
cohorts. Study of historical changes in aging rates was
focused on more recent trends for 1910 to 1940 cohorts
and used 2294 cohorts. The age-specific cohort death
rates of men and women are available in the database
from ages 0 to 110 and older. However, cohort mortality
data are often not available for the whole age range, be-
cause many cohorts are not extinct. Data are available in
one-year age and time increments denoted asMx, where
x indicates single year of age.
Historical changes of actuarial aging rates in human
cohorts. Historical changes of actuarial aging rates in
demographic cohorts were not studied before. Cohort
mortality data are not as numerous as cross-sectional
data and require availability of long time series of mor-
tality for cohort mortality reconstruction. For this study
we selected single-year cohorts born from 1900 to 1940
in order to cover maximal number of countries.
Historical trends of cohort actuarial aging rate
were analyzed for time interval from 1910 to 1940 (birth
years of corresponding cohorts). For each country/sex
we run linear regression of the Gompertz slope param-
eter on year of birth for corresponding cohort in order
to estimate the general trend for actuarial aging rate.
Table1 presents slope coefficients of this linear regres-
sion together with corresponding p-values. Note that
in contrast to cross-sectional data, actuarial aging rates
GAVRILOV, GAVRILOVA178 0
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 88 No. 11 2023
Table 1. Historical changes of actuarial aging rates from 1910 to 1940 human birth cohorts*
Country/Region
Men Women
Slope coefficient
of linear regression ×10
3
p-value
Slope coefficient
of linear regression ×10
3
p-value
Australia 0.2194 0.001 0.1387 0.019
Austria –0.3734 <0.001 –0.1755 0.004
Belgium –0.0585 0.031 –0.0137 0.721
Bulgaria –1.1383 <0.001 –0.7642 <0.001
Belarus –1.3228 <0.001 –1.3422 <0.001
Canada –0.0321 0.415 –0.0740 0.076
Switzerland –0.1837 0.001 –0.0882 0.033
Czech Republic –0.0871 <0.001 –0.6300 <0.001
Germany –0.2687 <0.001 0.0352 0.347
Denmark –0.7425 <0.001 –0.8647 <0.001
Spain –0.3475 <0.001 0.0445 0.346
Estonia –1.4662 <0.001 –1.5405 <0.001
Finland –0.0140 0.750 –0.2237 0.008
France, total population –0.3126 <0.001 0.1574 <0.001
England and Wales, total population –0.1505 0.032 –0.1443 0.030
Northern Ireland –0.000006 0.892 0.0960 0.283
United Kingdom –0.1622 0.020 –0.1272 0.053
Scotland –0.2686 <0.001 0.0398 0.541
Hungary –1.2918 <0.001 –0.7143 <0.001
Ireland –0.5714 <0.001 –0.2981 0.001
Iceland –0.1458 0.435 0.3480 0.195
Italy 0.0291 0.614 0.0944 0.039
Japan –0.2001 <0.001 0.0812 0.003
Lithuania –1.1191 <0.001 –1.0182 <0.001
Luxemburg –0.3288 0.001 –0.0594 0.668
Latvia –1.2239 <0.001 –1.2308 <0.001
Netherlands –0.4269 <0.001 –0.5814 <0.001
Norway –0.4545 <0.001 –0.5405 <0.001
New Zealand 0.0900 0.335 0.0643 0.401
Poland –1.3398 <0.001 1.1047 <0.001
Portugal –0.5002 <0.001 –0.5316 <0.001
ACTUARIAL AGING RATES IN HUMAN COHORTS 1781
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 88 No. 11 2023
Table 1 (cont.)
Country/Region
Men Women
Slope coefficient
of linear regression ×10
3
p-value
Slope coefficient
of linear regression ×10
3
p-value
Russia –1.0891 <0.001 –1.3581 <0.001
Slovakia –1.0837 <0.001 –0.6272 <0.001
Slovenia 2.1571 <0.001 2.9576 <0.001
Sweden –0.2394 <0.001 –0.2537 <0.001
Taiwan –0.1583 <0.001 –0.4012 <0.001
Ukraine –1.0314 <0.001 –1.1605 <0.001
USA 0.1323 0.003 0.0343 0.400
Note. Slope coefficients of linear regression for dependencies of actuarial aging rate on birth cohort.
* Gompertz parameters were estimated in age interval 50-80 years. Linear regression of the Gompertz slope coefficient on time
(cohort) was run over 31 cohorts for each region/sex. Cases with statistically significant (p<0.05) changes of actuarial aging rate
are highlighted in bold.
forcohort data tend to decrease over time in the majority
of studied populations. Actuarial aging rates decreased in
22 cases for both sexes, in 7 cases for men only and one
case for women only. In 10 cases for men and 15 cases
for women actuarial aging rates showed no statistically
significant change. Thus, 68% of populations demon-
strated decreasing trend of actuarial aging rate.
While analyzing individual trends for each country
we found two distinct patterns of change for actuarial ag-
ing rate. In lower mortality Western European countries
(Austria, Germany, Denmark, Spain, Finland, France,
England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Italy, Scotland,
Great Britain, Ireland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal,
Sweden), Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, and
USA actuarial aging rates decreased until approximately
the 1930th cohort and then increased (Fig.1a).
In higher mortality Baltic countries and countries of
the Eastern Europe (Bulgaria, Belarus, Czech Republic,
Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Russia,
Slovakia, Ukraine) actuarial aging rates always declined
(Fig.1b). Figure1 is only an illustration, but the same two
patterns are observed for other countries as well. There
are a few exceptions. In Belgium actuarial aging rates
remained flat for both men and women. In Switzerland
actuarial aging rate increased for later birth cohorts only
for women and remained flat for men. In Taiwan actuar-
ial aging rate increased for men and continued its decline
for women.
Figure 2 shows mortality for 1920th, 1930th, and
1940th cohorts of Swedish and Polish men. Note that
mortality trajectories diverge for all three cohorts in
Poland, which corresponds to declining actuarial aging
rates over subsequent birth cohorts. On the other hand,
only 1920th and 1930th cohorts show mortality diver-
gence in the case of Sweden corresponding to the pat-
tern presented in Fig. 1 for the lower mortality Western
European country.
Mortality data for human cohorts provided us an
opportunity to study time trends of cohort actuarial ag-
ing rate in different countries. Overall, cohort actuarial
aging rate demonstrates a declining trend. On the other
hand, lower mortality countries show a V-shaped pat-
tern of the actuarial aging rate changes.
These results are different from results obtained for
cross-sectional mortality data. Our earlier studies demon-
strated that the period actuarial aging rates are relatively
stable over time at least until the 1960s [1, 8]. Studies
by Bongaarts confirmed this initial finding [6, 7]. With
longer time series it became clear that actuarial aging
rates have more complex trajectories after the 1960s and
demonstrate an increasing pattern after the 1980s [2,3].
Compensation effect of mortality for human cohorts.
Compensation effect of mortality (CEM) refers to mor-
tality convergence, when higher values for the slope
parameter (in the Gompertz function) are compensat-
ed by lower values of the intercept parameterR
0
in dif-
ferent populations of a given biological species [1, 13].
CEM can be quantified using inverse relationship of the
Gompertz parameters of the Gompertz–Makeham equa-
tion presented in equation (2). Study of CEM was in-
spired by the pioneer publication of Strehler and Mildvan
who found an inverse correlation between the Gompertz
parameters [14]. However, these authors did not take
into account the Makeham parameter when using rather
old mortality data and hence obtained a spurious cor-
relation. The term “compensation effect of mortality”
GAVRILOV, GAVRILOVA1782
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 88 No. 11 2023
Fig. 1. Historical changes of actuarial aging rate in the lower mortality Western European (Italy)(a) and higher mortality Baltic (Lithuania)(b)
countries.
Fig. 2. Mortality (common log scale) as a function of age for three cohorts of Swedish and Polish men.
ACTUARIAL AGING RATES IN HUMAN COHORTS 1783
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 88 No. 11 2023
Table 2. Characteristics of compensation law of mortality for three birth cohorts based on the Gompertz model*.
Human Mortality Database
Population
Regression coefficients
Correlation coefficient
between lnR
0
and α
Number
of observations
lnM ±σ B ±σ, years
All single-year birth cohorts from 1920 to 1940
Men –2.39 ± 0.10 84.02 ± 1.33 –0.9085 850
Women –4.36 ± 0.11 66.13 ± 1.28 –0.8716 850
Both sexes –3.29 ± 0.09 75.35 ± 1.23 –0.9029 850
All single-year birth cohorts from 1930 to 1940
Men –1.57 ± 0.09 97.81 ± 1.29 –0.9624 460
Women –3.36 ± 0.15 79.18 ± 1.77 –0.9025 460
Both sexes –2.38 ± 0.10 89.59 ± 1.32 –0.9536 460
1940 birth cohort
Men –1.68 ± 0.16 97.33 ± 2.23 –0.9894 43
Women –2.87 ± 0.39 86.24 ± 4.53 –0.9479 43
Both sexes –2.45 ± 0.19 89.89 ± 2.53 –0.9842 43
* Gompertz parameters were estimated in age interval 50-80 years.
wasintroduced in 1978 when account for the Makeham
parameter resulted in totally different parameter estimates
of the Strehler–Mildvan correlation [15]. Compensation
effect of mortality is defined as a convergence of age-spe-
cific senescent (age-dependent) mortality dependencies
at advanced ages [1,15].
The coordinate corresponding to the age at which
all the mortality trajectories intersect(B) has been called
the species-specific life span [1]. It was found that for
humans its value is equal to 95 ± 2 years when using
cross-sectional data [1, 2]. It should be noted that the
compensation effect of mortality can be observed by a
simple visual inspection of mortality trajectories without
calculation of the Gompertz parameters [2]. Also, CEM
can be observed not only for humans, but for some oth-
er biological species [1,13].
Data on cohort mortality for different countries al-
lows us to test the existence of the compensation law of
mortality among cohorts. Compensation law of mortal-
ity for cohort data was never tested before. We estimat-
ed parameters of linear regression presented by equa-
tion(2) using cohort data.
This linear regression was run for more recent birth
cohorts of 1920-1940 using estimates of the Gompertz
parameters available for 76 populations of men and
women obtained in the age interval 50-80 years. Table2
presents the results of these estimations. These results
Fig. 3. Compensation effect of mortality for human cohorts. Mortality
(common log scale) of 1930 birth cohorts in six populations. Designa-
tions: M,male; F,female.
GAVRILOV, GAVRILOVA178 4
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 88 No. 11 2023
confirm the existence of compensation effect of mor-
tality for human cohorts, although values of species-
specific life span [parameter B of linear regression in
equation (2)] are somewhat lower compared to the cross-
sectional data [1,2]. These results also show lower val-
ues of the species-specific life span for historically older
birth cohorts, which is in agreement with findings ob-
tained for cross-sectional data [2].
Overall, we can conclude that estimates of the spe-
cies-specific lifespan based on cohort data (for later
birth cohorts) demonstrate a good agreement with ear-
lier publications based on cross-sectional data [1, 2].
These results mean that quantitative measures of CEM
for humans are rather stable.
Figure 3 demonstrates mortality convergence at old-
er ages (compensation effect of mortality) for 1930 birth
cohorts of several populations. Note that men of Poland
have lower actuarial aging rates compared to men of Swe-
den and women have higher actuarial aging rates com-
pared to men. Also, note that age trajectories for women
show slightly accelerated trend confirming earlier studies
of life table aging rate [10].
Figure 3 is another illustration of CEM existence,
which does not require statistical estimation of the
Gompertz parameters.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
It was found that the compensation effect of mor-
tality does exist for cohort data. Study of the quanti-
tative measures of CEM using cohort data confirmed
that the inverse correlation between the Gompertz in-
tercept parameter, ln(R
0
), and the Gompertz slope pa-
rameter(α) of the Gompertz equation does exist and is
highly statistically significant when we compare differ-
ent human populations. Estimates of the species-spe-
cific lifespan (parameter B) for later birth cohorts are
close to estimates obtained for cross-sectional data [1,2]
although still are somewhat lower. It was also found
that the estimates of the species-specific lifespan are
lower for historically older birth cohorts. Thus, com-
pensation effect of mortality is confirmed for human
birth cohorts.
In this study we also analyzed historical changes
of the actuarial aging rates (Gompertz slope parame-
ter) for human cohorts. In our study we analyzed time
trends in cohort actuarial aging rates for each popula-
tion separately from 1910 to 1940 birth cohort. It turns
out that the majority of populations (52 out of 76
or 68%) demonstrate declining pattern of actuarial ag-
ing rate. Actuarial aging rates remain stable for 23% of
human cohorts. This result obtained for the cohort ac-
tuarial aging rates is different from the result obtained
for cross-sectional data. It was found that period actu-
arial aging rates demonstrate an increasing pattern after
the 1980s for the majority of studied populations [2, 3].
Before the 1980s period actuarial aging rates showed
stability over time [1, 2, 8]. On the other hand, actuarial
aging rates measured for birth cohorts of the same coun-
try and sex has a tendency to decrease over time.
When studying cohort mortality, it is important to
realize that over the life course, a cohort is affected both
by aging, which increases mortality, and by improvement
in living conditions, which reduces mortality. It is theoret-
ically possible that the actuarial aging rate may eventually
decrease to very low levels close to zero, which can be
considered as an apparent aging arrest. For example, if
the increase in mortality with age is 8% per year, but mor-
tality decreases over time at a rate of 2% per year, then
the observed increase in mortality in the cohort would
end up being only 6% per year (8–2 = 6) [16]. If the
rate of historical decline in mortality is age-dependent,
this might look on the cohort data like a decrease in the
actuarial aging rate in more recent cohorts of people.
In any case, a decrease in the actuarial aging rate looks
like a slowing down of aging. It is still unclear what can
explain the increase in the actuarial aging rate in the
lower mortality countries among more recent birth co-
horts. One possible explanation is that these countries
already exhausted most resources for mortality decline
such as decline in cardiovascular mortality and smoking
habit. Indeed, mortality in many of these countries sta-
bilized during the last 10-15 years suggesting that the
main force of decreasing actuarial aging rate almost dis-
appeared [17]. Thus, now the actuarial aging rate in the
lower mortality countries is determined mostly by the
aging process and depends on the senescent mortality.
Higher mortality countries like countries of the Eastern
Europe still have some remaining room for mortality
decline and hence their actuarial aging rate continues
to decline.
It appears that aging should be measured not
by the rate of mortality increase with age, but by the
rate of loss of functional elements (mainly special-
ized cells) in the body. Such an approach to measur-
ing the true aging rate was proposed by the reliability
theory of aging [1, 4, 18]. According to this theory, a
rough estimate of the true aging rate can be obtained
by measuring one of the CEM parameters [inverse of
the species-specific lifespan in equation (2)]. Anoth-
er theory of aging (metronomic theory of aging) has
been proposed by Alexey M. Olovnikov [19]. Although
he considered the aging process as a program, he em-
phasized that this program refers mainly to the repro-
duction aspects of this process. Indeed, the time of the
beginning and the end of reproduction in women have
certain signs of a program [20]. However, the total lifes-
pan can be better described by reliability models, which
assume gradual destruction of the organism and loss of
functional elements including telomeres and special-
ized cells.
ACTUARIAL AGING RATES IN HUMAN COHORTS 1785
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 88 No. 11 2023
Acknowledgments. We are most grateful to the Rus-
sian theorist, Alexey Matveyevich Olovnikov (1936-
2022), for many hours of friendly scientific discussions
with him on many broad topics of the biology of aging.
This article is a part of a special issue of the journal de-
voted to his memory. We knew Dr.Olovnikov in person
since 1978, and greatly benefited from scientific conver-
sations with him. One example of his active participa-
tion in the discussion of our scientific studies and pre-
sentations is provided here: https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=3cI5M88I-NU [in Russian].
Contributions. Leonid A. Gavrilov designed the
study, analyzed, and interpreted results, and edited the
manuscript. Natalia S. Gavrilova conducted statistical
analyses, and prepared the manuscript.
Funding. This work was partially support-
ed by the National Institutes of Health (project no.
NIH R21AG054849).
Ethics declarations. The authors declare no conflict
of interest in financial or any other sphere. This article
does not contain any studies with human participants or
animals performed by any of the authors.
REFERENCES
1. Gavrilov, L. A., and Gavrilova, N. S. (1991) The Biology
of Life Span: A Quantitative Approach, Harwood Academic
Publisher, New York.
2. Gavrilov, L. A., and Gavrilova, N. S. (2022) Trends in
human species-specific lifespan and actuarial aging rate,
Biochemistry (Moscow), 87, 1998-2011, doi: 10.1134/
S0006297922120173.
3. Tai, T. H., and Noymer, A. (2018) Models for estimating
empirical Gompertz mortality: with an application to evo-
lution of the Gompertzian slope, Popul. Ecol., 60, 171-184,
doi: 10.1007/s10144-018-0609-6.
4. Gavrilov, L. A., and Gavrilova, N. S. (2006) Reliability
Theory of Aging and Longevity. in Handbook of the Biology
of Aging (Masoro, E. J., and Austad, S. N., eds) 6Edn.,
Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 3-42, doi: 10.1016/
B978-012088387-5/50004-2.
5. Mikhalsky, A. I. (2023) On the Paper by Leonid A. Gavri-
lov and Natalia S. Gavrilova entitled “Trends in Human
Species-Specific Lifespan and Actuarial Aging Rate” Pub-
lished in Biochemistry (Moscow), Vol. 87, Nos. 12-13,
pp. 1622-1633 (2022), Biochemistry (Moscow), 88,
162-163, doi:10.1134/S0006297923010145.
6. Bongaarts, J. (2005) Long-range trends in adult mortality:
Models and projection methods, Demography, 42, 23-49,
doi:10.1353/dem.2005.0003.
7. Bongaarts, J. (2009) Trends in senescent life expec-
tancy, Popul. Stud. (Camb), 63, 203-213, doi: 10.1080/
00324720903165456.
8. Gavrilov, L. A., Gavrilova, N. S., and Nosov, V. N. (1983)
Human life span stopped increasing: why? Gerontology,
29, 176-180, doi:10.1159/000213111.
9. Horiuchi, S. (1997) Postmenopausal acceleration of
age-related mortality increase, J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci.
Med. Sci., 52, B78-B92, doi: 10.1093/gerona/52A.1.B78.
10. Li, T., Yang, Y. C., and Anderson, J. J. (2013) Mor-
tality increase in late-middle and early-old age: het-
erogeneity in death processes as a new explanation,
Demography, 50, 1563-1591, doi: 10.1007/s13524-013-
0222-4.
11. Tarkhov, A. E., Menshikov, L. I., and Fedichev, P. O.
(2017) Strehler-Mildvan correlation is a degenerate man-
ifold of Gompertz fit, J.Theor. Biol., 416, 180-189, doi:
10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.017.
12. Human Mortality Database. University of Califor-
nia, Berkeley (USA), and Max Planck Institute for De-
mographic Research (Germany), URL: https://www.
mortality.org or http://www.humanmortality.de (accessed
on 6.5.2022).
13. Golubev, A. (2019) A 2D analysis of correlations be-
tween the parameters of the Gompertz-Makeham model
(or law?) of relationships between aging, mortality, and
longevity, Biogerontology, 20, 799-821, doi: 10.1007/
s10522-019-09828-z.
14. Strehler, B. L., and Mildvan, A. S. (1960) General theory
of mortality and aging, Science, 132, 14-21, doi:10.1126/
science.132.3418.14.
15. Gavrilov, L. A., Gavrilova, N. S., and Yaguzhinsky, L.S.
(1978) The main patterns of aging and death of animals
from the point of view of the theory of reliability [in Rus-
sian], J.Gen. Biol., 39, 734-742.
16. Gavrilov, L. A., and Gavrilova, N. S. (2023) On the
Commentary by Anatoly I. Mikhalsky Published in
Biochemistry (Moscow), Vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 162-163
2023), Biochemistry (Moscow), 88, 289, doi: 10.1134/
S0006297923020116.
17. Ho, J. Y., and Hendi, A. S. (2018) Recent trends in life
expectancy across high income countries: retrospective
observational study, Br.Med.J., 362, k2562, doi:10.1136/
bmj.k2562.
18. Gavrilov, L. A., and Gavrilova, N. S. (2001) The reli-
ability theory of aging and longevity, J.Theor. Biol., 213,
527-545, doi:10.1006/jtbi.2001.2430.
19. Olovnikov, A. M. (2022) Planetary metronome as a regu-
lator of lifespan and aging rate: the metronomic hypoth-
esis, Biochemistry (Moscow), 87, 1640-1650, doi:10.1134/
S0006297922120197.
20. Gavrilova, N. S., Gavrilov, L. A., Severin, F. F., and
Skulachev, V. P. (2012) Testing predictions of the pro-
grammed and stochastic theories of aging: comparison of
variation in age at death, menopause, and sexual matu-
ration, Biochemistry (Moscow), 77, 754-760, doi:10.1134/
S0006297912070085.