Comparison of Methods for MicroRNA Isolation from Extracellular Vesicles Obtained from Ascitic Fluids

---

Gleb O. Skryabin¹, Svetlana V. Vinokurova¹, Nadezhda V. Elkina¹, Daria A. Denisova¹, Anastasiya A. Beliaeva^1,2, Kirill I. Zhordania³, Dmitry V. Bagrov², Adel D. Enikeev¹, Sergey A. Galetsky¹, Andrey V. Komelkov^1,a*, Galina I. Krasnoshekova³, and Elena M. Tchevkina¹

¹Institute of Carcinogenesis, Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 115478 Moscow, Russia

²Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 111234 Moscow, Russia

³Institute of Clinical Oncology, Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 115478 Moscow, Russia

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received August 24, 2022; Revised September 21, 2022; Accepted September 26, 2022

---

Secreted extracellular vesicles (EVs) contain active biomolecules, including miRNAs, composition of which reflects epigenetic changes occurring in cells during pathological processes, in particular, malignant transformation. The accumulated pool of data on the role of EVs in carcinogenesis has stimulated investigations of the EV-derived cancer markers. The most important factor limiting development of this scientific direction is lack of “gold standards” both for methods of EV isolation from biological fluids and for analyzing their molecular content, including composition of miRNAs. Here we first examined efficacy of various methods for small RNA isolation from EVs contained in ascitic fluid for subsequent miRNA analysis. Comparison of different commercial kits showed advantages of the methods based on phenol-chloroform extraction: Total Exosome RNA & Protein Isolation Kit and miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit. Analysis of the small RNA transcriptome showed presence of various classes of molecules in the EVs, among which proportion of miRNAs averaged 6% and reaching 10% with the Total Exosome RNA & Protein Isolation Kit. The PureLink miRNA Isolation Kit demonstrated the lowest efficiency. The miRNeasy Advanced Serum/Plasma Kit showed the highest concentration of the small RNA fraction, miRNA proportion of which, however, did not exceed that obtained with the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit and Total Exosome RNA & Protein Isolation Kit. Moreover, RT-PCR analysis of the individual molecules showed lower levels of each of investigated miRNAs (miR-1246, miR-200b-5p, miR-200c-3p, and miR-23a-3p) when using the miRNeasy Advanced Serum/Plasma Kit. In conclusion, Total Exosome RNA & Protein Isolation Kit and miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit can be considered as optimal kits in terms of performance based on combination of the studied characteristics, including small RNA concentration, percentage of microRNA according to bioanalyzer and sequencing results, and levels of individual miRNAs detected by RT-PCR.

---

KEY WORDS: exosomes, miRNA, isolation methods, extracellular vesicles, miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit, Total Exosome RNA & Protein Isolation Kit, PureLink miRNA Isolation Kit, miRNeasy Advanced Serum/Plasma Kit

DOI: 10.1134/S0006297922110141

---