The Controversial Denouement of Vertebrate DNA Methylation Research
M. Ehrlich
Human Genetics Program SL31, Tulane Medical School, 1430 Tulane Ave. New
Orleans, LA 70112, USA; fax: 011-504-988-1763; E-mail:
ehrlich@tulane.edu
Received November 15, 2004
The study of the biological role of DNA methylation in vertebrates has
involved considerable controversy. Research in this area has proceeded
well despite the complexity of the subject and the difficulties in
establishing biological roles, some of which are summarized in this
review. Now there is justifiably much more interest in DNA methylation
than previously, and many more laboratories are engaged in this
research. The results of numerous studies indicate that some
tissue-specific differences in vertebrate DNA methylation help maintain
patterns of gene expression or are involved in fine-tuning or
establishing expression patterns. Therefore, vertebrate DNA methylation
cannot just be assigned a role in silencing transposable elements and
foreign DNA sequences, as has been suggested. DNA methylation is
clearly implicated in modulating X chromosome inactivation and in
establishing genetic imprinting. Also, hypermethylation of CpG-rich
promoters of tumor suppressor genes in cancer has a critical role in
downregulating expression of these genes and thus participating in
carcinogenesis. The complex nature of DNA methylation patterns extends
to carcinogenesis because global DNA hypomethylation is found in the
same cancers displaying hypermethylation elsewhere in the genome. A
wide variety of cancers display both DNA hypomethylation and
hypermethylation, and either of these types of changes can be
significantly associated with tumor progression. These findings and the
independence of cancer-linked DNA hypomethylation from cancer-linked
hypermethylation strongly implicate DNA hypomethylation, as well as
hypermethylation, in promoting carcinogenesis. Furthermore, various DNA
demethylation methodologies have been shown to increase the formation
of certain types of cancers in animals, and paradoxically, DNA
hypermethylation can cause carcinogenesis in other model systems.
Therefore, there is a need for caution in the current use of
demethylating agents as anti-cancer drugs. Nonetheless, DNA
demethylation therapy clearly may be very useful in cases where better
alternatives do not exist.
KEY WORDS: DNA methylation, cancer, vertebrates